Relying party risk-adjusted indicator system and method

ABSTRACT

A method and system capable of generating a relying party risk-adjusted indicator associated with and used by users and parties entering into one or more transactions with a relying party.

BACKGROUND 1. Technical Field

This disclosure is related to systems and methods used to transferidentity trust and identity information using a risk evaluatedidentifier.

2. Technical Considerations

Transaction systems require user verification. Verification may take theform of the user providing a proof-of-identity. Such a proof may takethe form of a government proof-of-identity credential or document (e.g.,a social security number, a driver's license, or passport) that the usersends to the system.

Risk assessments are often undertaken to determine what potential risk atransacting user poses for a party conducting the transaction (referredto hereafter as a “party” or as a “relying party”). For example, paymentsystems may use a user's transaction history as an input into a riskmodel to estimate the likelihood a user may fulfill or default on apayment. Similarly, banks and loan agencies may use a user's credithistory as a factor in its decision to make or not make a new loan.Payment systems may use user device information to recognize returningusers over time and to detect attempts to spoof the user's identity. Insuch cases, the assessed risk is related to the transaction to beconducted. It does not necessarily index potential risks a user may poseto one or more classes of transaction that may be entered into.

SUMMARY

Accordingly, and generally, the present disclosure providesillustrative, non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects ofimproved apparatus, systems and methods that address the transfer ofuser information and the creation by a relying party risk-adjustedindicator system of at least one relying party risk-adjusted indicatorthat may be associated with the information transferred. While a uniquetransaction identifier may be generated for each transaction that may beused by a user for entering into or conducting at least one transaction,the risk the user presents to a relying party with it may vary with theat least one transaction being entered into. A relying partyrisk-adjusted indicator system may determine a relying partyrisk-adjusted indicator that may be used by the party issuing arequested account or conducting the at least one transaction todetermine their transactional risk before issuing the account orconducting the at least one transaction and may be used by the relyingparty in support of a decision to approve or reject issuing the accountor entering into or conducting the transaction with the user.

In some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects, provided is arelying party risk-adjusted indicator generation system, comprising: atleast one computing device programmed or configured to: receive at leastone account or transaction request from at least one user to enter intoa transaction with at least one relying party; receive at least oneproof-of-identity from the at least one user; generate at least oneone-time transaction identifier; access data associated with the atleast one user; generate at least one risk signifier associated with theat least one user based on the accessed data; generate at least onerelying party risk-adjusted indicator comprising the at least one risksignifier and the at least one one-time transaction identifier;communicate the at least one one-time transaction identifier to the atleast one user; and communicate the at least one relying partyrisk-adjusted indicator to the at least one relying party to thetransaction.

In some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects, the at leastone computing device of the relying party risk-adjusted indicatorgeneration system is programmed or configured to: receive the at leastone one-time transaction identifier from the at least one user; andauthenticate the at least one user and proceed with the at least onetransaction. In some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects,the at least one transaction comprises at least one of the following:requesting an account, conducting a transaction, or any combinationthereof.

In some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects, the at leastone risk signifier is based on at least one of the following: at leastone device fingerprint, at least one location, at least one transactionhistory, at least one risk score from at least one risk model, at leastone assertion profile associated with the at least one user, at least apartial match of the at least one proof-of-identity provided by the atleast one user with at least one stored proof-of-identity previouslyreceived from the at least one user, or any combination thereof. In somenon-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects, the at least one risksignifier is communicated as at least one of the following appended toor concatenated with a one-time transaction identifier: a number, analphanumeric, a symbol, a minus sign, a plus sign, an equal sign, or anycombination thereof.

In some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects, the at leastone one-time transaction identifier and the at least one risk signifierare both numbers, which are combined to determine or generate therelying party risk-adjusted indicator using at least one of thefollowing: multiplication, division, addition, a non-linear expression,a result normalized in relation to a predefined scale, a hashed number,an encrypted number, or any combination thereof. In some non-limitingexpressions, embodiments, or aspects, the data associated with the atleast one relying party risk-adjusted indicator is stored in at leastone of the at least one computing device's storage devices in at leastone of the following: on a block chain, in a relational database, ahierarchical database, an object-oriented database, a graphicaldatabase, or any combination thereof. In some non-limiting expressions,embodiments, or aspects, the at least one proof-of-identity comprises atleast one of the following: at least one device identifier, a devicefingerprint, a phone number, a location identifier, a home, a business,a mailing address, an assertion profile, at least one assertion known ornot known about the user, a government identifier, a social securitynumber, a driver's license, an authorized photo, a passport, agovernment furnished identity card or tag, or any combination thereof.

In some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects, the at leastone risk signifier comprises output of at least one risk model computingthe risk of the at least one transaction using at least one of thefollowing: at least one user's payment, an agreement, an assertion, acompromise-event reference identifier, a compromise event history, datafrom at least one risk source, a credit bureau, a government agency ordepartment, or any combination thereof. In some non-limitingexpressions, embodiments, or aspects, the at least one computing deviceof the relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation system isprogrammed or configured to generate a relying party risk-adjustedindicator by combining the at least one one-time transaction identifierwith a risk signifier associated with the risk the at least one userposes to the at least one relying party for the at least one transactionto be conducted.

In some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects, provided is arelying party risk-adjusted indicator generation method, comprising:receiving, with at least one computing device, at least one account ortransaction request from at least one user to enter into at least onetransaction with at least one party; receiving, with at least onecomputing device, at least one proof-of-identity from the at least oneuser; generating, with at least one computing device, at least oneone-time transaction identifier; accessing, with at least one computingdevice, data associated with the at least one user; generating, with atleast one computing device, at least one risk signifier associated withthe data; generating, with at least one computing device, at least onerelying party risk-adjusted identifier comprising the at least one risksignifier and the at least one one-time transaction identifier;communicating, with at least one computing device, the at least oneone-time transaction identifier to the at least one user; andcommunicating, with at least one computing device, the at least onerelying party risk-adjusted indicator to the at least one relying partyto the transaction.

In some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects, the methodfurther comprises generating, with at least one computing device, arelying party risk-adjusted indicator by combining the at least oneone-time transaction identifier with at least one risk signifierassociated with the risk the at least one user poses to the relyingparty for the at least one transaction to be conducted. In somenon-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects, the at least one risksignifier is based on at least one of the following: at least one devicefingerprint, a location, at least one transaction history, at least onerisk score from at least one risk model, at least one assertion profileassociated with the at least one user, at least a partial match of theat least one proof-of-identity that the at least one user provides withat least one stored proof-of-identity previously received from the atleast one user, or any combination thereof. In some non-limitingexpressions, embodiments, or aspects, the at least one risk signifier iscommunicated as at least one of the following appended to orconcatenated with a one-time transaction identifier: a number, analphanumeric, a symbol, a minus sign, a plus sign, an equal sign, or anycombination thereof.

In some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects, the at leastone one-time transaction identifier and the at least one risk signifierare both numbers, which are combined to determine or generate at leastone relying party risk-adjusted indicator using at least one of thefollowing: multiplication, division, addition, a non-linear expression,a result normalized in relation to a predefined scale, a hashed number,an encrypted number, or any combination thereof. In some non-limitingexpressions, embodiments, or aspects, the data associated with the atleast one relying party risk-adjusted indicator is stored in the atleast one computing device's storage device in at least one of thefollowing: on a block chain, in a relational database, a hierarchicaldatabase, an object-oriented database, a graphical database, or anycombination thereof.

In some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects, the at leastone proof-of-identity comprises at least one of the following: at leastone device identifier, a device fingerprint, a phone number, a locationidentifier, a home, a business, a mailing address, an assertion profile,at least one assertion known or not known about the user, a governmentidentifier, a social security number, a driver's license, an authorizedphoto, a passport, a government furnished identity card or tag, or anycombination thereof. In some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, oraspects, the at least one risk signifier comprises output of at leastone risk model computing the risk of the at least one transaction usingat least one of the following: at least one user's payment, anagreement, an assertion, a compromise-event reference identifier, acompromise event history, data from at least one risk source, a creditbureau, a government agency or department, or any combination thereof.

Further non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects are set forthin the following numbered clauses.

Clause 1: A relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation system,comprising: at least one computing device programmed or configured to:receive at least one account or transaction request from at least oneuser to enter into a transaction with at least one relying party;receive at least one proof-of-identity from the at least one user;generate at least one one-time transaction identifier; access dataassociated with the at least one user; generate at least one risksignifier associated with the at least one user based on the accesseddata; generate at least one relying party risk-adjusted indicatorcomprising the at least one risk signifier and the at least one one-timetransaction identifier; communicate the at least one one-timetransaction identifier to the at least one user; and communicate the atleast one relying party risk-adjusted indicator to the at least onerelying party to the transaction.

Clause 2: The relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation system ofclause 1, wherein the at least one computing device of the relying partyrisk-adjusted indicator generation system is programmed or configuredto: receive the at least one one-time transaction identifier from the atleast one user; and authenticate the at least one user and proceed withthe at least one transaction.

Clause 3: The relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation system ofclause 1 or 2, wherein the at least one transaction comprises at leastone of the following: requesting an account, conducting a transaction,or any combination thereof.

Clause 4: The relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation system ofany of clauses 1-3, wherein the at least one risk signifier is based onat least one of the following: at least one device fingerprint, at leastone location, at least one transaction history, at least one risk scorefrom at least one risk model, at least one assertion profile associatedwith the at least one user, at least a partial match of the at least oneproof-of-identity provided by the at least one user with at least onestored proof-of-identity previously received from the at least one user,or any combination thereof.

Clause 5: The relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation system ofany of clauses 1-4, wherein the at least one risk signifier iscommunicated as at least one of the following appended to orconcatenated with a one-time transaction identifier: a number, analphanumeric, a symbol, a minus sign, a plus sign, an equal sign, or anycombination thereof.

Clause 6: The relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation system ofany of clauses 1-5, wherein the at least one one-time transactionidentifier and the at least one risk signifier are both numbers, whichare combined to determine or generate the relying party risk-adjustedindicator using at least one of the following: multiplication, division,addition, a non-linear expression, a result normalized in relation to apredefined scale, a hashed number, an encrypted number, or anycombination thereof.

Clause 7: The relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation system ofany of clauses 1-6, wherein the data associated with the at least onerelying party risk-adjusted indicator is stored in at least one of theat least one computing device's storage devices in at least one of thefollowing: on a block chain, in a relational database, a hierarchicaldatabase, an object-oriented database, a graphical database, or anycombination thereof.

Clause 8: The relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation system ofany of clauses 1-7, wherein the at least one proof-of-identity comprisesat least one of the following: at least one device identifier, a devicefingerprint, a phone number, a location identifier, a home, a business,a mailing address, an assertion profile, at least one assertion known ornot known about the user, a government identifier, a social securitynumber, a driver's license, an authorized photo, a passport, agovernment furnished identity card or tag, or any combination thereof.

Clause 9: The relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation system ofany of clauses 1-8, wherein the at least one risk signifier comprisesoutput of at least one risk model computing the risk of the at least onetransaction using at least one of the following: at least one user'spayment, an agreement, an assertion, a compromise-event referenceidentifier, a compromise event history, data from at least one risksource, a credit bureau, a government agency or department, or anycombination thereof.

Clause 10: The relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation systemof any of clauses 1-9, wherein the at least one computing device of therelying party risk-adjusted indicator generation system is programmed orconfigured to generate a relying party risk-adjusted indicator bycombining the at least one one-time transaction identifier with a risksignifier associated with the risk the at least one user poses to the atleast one relying party for the at least one transaction to beconducted.

Clause 11: A relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation method,comprising: receiving, with at least one computing device, at least oneaccount or transaction request from at least one user to enter into atleast one transaction with at least one party; receiving, with at leastone computing device, at least one proof-of-identity from the at leastone user; generating, with at least one computing device, at least oneone-time transaction identifier; accessing, with at least one computingdevice, data associated with the at least one user; generating, with atleast one computing device, at least one risk signifier associated withthe data; generating, with at least one computing device, at least onerelying party risk-adjusted identifier comprising the at least one risksignifier and the at least one one-time transaction identifier;communicating, with at least one computing device, the at least oneone-time transaction identifier to the at least one user, andcommunicating, with at least one computing device, the at least onerelying party risk-adjusted indicator to the at least one relying partyto the transaction.

Clause 12: The relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation methodof clause 11, further comprising generating, with at least one computingdevice, a relying party risk-adjusted indicator by combining the atleast one one-time transaction identifier with at least one risksignifier associated with the risk the at least one user poses to therelying party for the at least one transaction to be conducted.

Clause 13: The relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation methodof clause 11 or 12, wherein the at least one risk signifier is based onat least one of the following: at least one device fingerprint, alocation, at least one transaction history, at least one risk score fromat least one risk model, at least one assertion profile associated withthe at least one user, at least a partial match of the at least oneproof-of-identity that the at least one user provides with at least onestored proof-of-identity previously received from the at least one user,or any combination thereof.

Clause 14: The relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation methodof any of clauses 11-13, wherein the at least one risk signifier iscommunicated as at least one of the following appended to orconcatenated with a one-time transaction identifier: a number, analphanumeric, a symbol, a minus sign, a plus sign, an equal sign, or anycombination thereof.

Clause 15: The relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation methodof any of clauses 11-14, wherein the at least one one-time transactionidentifier and the at least one risk signifier are both numbers, whichare combined to determine or generate at least one relying partyrisk-adjusted indicator using at least one of the following:multiplication, division, addition, a non-linear expression, a resultnormalized in relation to a predefined scale, a hashed number, anencrypted number, or any combination thereof.

Clause 16: The relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation methodof any of clauses 11-15, wherein the data associated with the at leastone relying party risk-adjusted indicator is stored in the at least onecomputing device's storage device in at least one of the following: on ablock chain, in a relational database, a hierarchical database, anobject-oriented database, a graphical database, or any combinationthereof.

Clause 17: The relying party risk-adjusted indicator generation methodof any of clauses 11-16, wherein the at least one proof-of-identitycomprises at least one of the following: at least one device identifier,a device fingerprint, a phone number, a location identifier, a home, abusiness, a mailing address, an assertion profile, at least oneassertion known or not known about the user, a government identifier, asocial security number, a driver's license, an authorized photo, apassport, a government furnished identity card or tag, or anycombination thereof.

Clause 18: The relying party risk-adjusted indicator method of any ofclauses 11-17, wherein the at least one risk signifier comprises outputof at least one risk model computing the risk of the at least onetransaction using at least one of the following: at least one user'spayment, an agreement, an assertion, a compromise-event referenceidentifier, a compromise event history, data from at least one risksource, a credit bureau, a government agency or department, or anycombination thereof.

These and other features and characteristics of the presently disclosedsubject matter, as well as the methods of operation and functions of therelated elements of structures and the combination of parts andeconomies of manufacture, will become more apparent upon considerationof the following description and the appended claims with reference tothe accompanying drawings, all of which form a part of thisspecification, wherein like reference numerals designate correspondingparts in the various figures. It is to be expressly understood, however,that the drawings are for the purpose of illustration and descriptiononly and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the disclosedsubject matter. As used in the specification and the claims, thesingular form of “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unlessthe context clearly dictates otherwise.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The drawings incorporated herein illustrate one or more non-limitingexpressions, embodiments, or aspects of a relying party risk-adjustedindicator system apparatus, system, and method that help explaindifferent aspects of the one or more expressions of the same. As such,the descriptions and drawings are not to be viewed as limiting any oneaspect of any expression, embodiment, or aspect of the one-time riskadjustment identity system's apparatus, systems, and methods. In thedrawings:

FIG. 1 is a non-limiting expression, embodiment, or aspect of systemelements according to the principles of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 is a non-limiting expression, embodiment, or aspect of processingaccording to the principles of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 is a non-limiting expression, embodiment, or aspect of processsteps according to the principles of the present disclosure.

FIG. 4 is a non-limiting expression, embodiment, or aspect of processsteps according to the principles of the present disclosure.

FIGS. 5A-5E are non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects ofdatabase structures according to the principles of the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 6 is a non-limiting expression, embodiment, or aspect of a userinteraction according to the principles of the present disclosure.

FIG. 7 is a non-limiting expression, embodiment, or aspect of a userinterface according to the principles of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

For purposes of the description hereinafter, the terms “end,” “upper,”“lower,” “right,” “left,” “vertical,” “horizontal,” “top,” “bottom,”“lateral,” “longitudinal,” and derivatives thereof shall relate toexpressions of the disclosure as it is oriented in the drawing figures.However, it is to be understood that the expressions, embodiments, oraspects of the disclosure may assume various alternative variations,computing device and storage device configurations within or amongdifferent parties and step sequences, except where expressly specifiedto the contrary. It is also to be understood that devices, computingdevice and storage device configurations, and processes illustrated inthe attached drawings, and described in the following specification, aresimply exemplary expressions, embodiments, or aspects of the disclosure.Hence, specific dimensions, configurations, and other physicalcharacteristics related to the expressions, embodiments, or aspectsdisclosed herein are not to be considered as limiting.

No aspect, component, element, structure, act, step, function,instruction, and/or the like used herein should be construed as criticalor essential unless explicitly described as such. Also, as used herein,the articles “a” and “an” are intended to include one or more items andmay be used interchangeably with “one or more” and “at least one.”Furthermore, as used herein, the term “set” is intended to include oneor more items (e.g., related items, unrelated items, a combination ofrelated and unrelated items, and/or the like) and may be usedinterchangeably with “one or more” or “at least one.” Where only oneitem is intended, the term “one” or similar language is used. Also, asused herein, the terms “has,” “have,” “having,” or the like are intendedto be open-ended terms. Further, the phrase “based on” is intended tomean “based at least partially on” unless explicitly stated otherwise.

As used herein, the terms “communication” and “communicate” may refer tothe reception, receipt, transmission, transfer, provision, and/or thelike of information (e.g., data, signals, messages, instructions,commands, and/or the like). For one unit (e.g., a device, a system, acomponent of a device or system, combinations thereof, and/or the like)to be in communication with another unit means that the one unit is ableto directly or indirectly receive information from and/or transmitinformation to the other unit. This may refer to a direct or indirectconnection (e.g., a direct communication connection, an indirectcommunication connection, and/or the like) that is wired and/or wirelessin nature. Additionally, two units may be in communication with eachother even though the information transmitted may be modified,processed, relayed, and/or routed between the first and second unit. Forexample, a first unit may be in communication with a second unit eventhough the first unit passively receives information and does notactively transmit information to the second unit. As another example, afirst unit may be in communication with a second unit if at least oneintermediary unit (e.g., a third unit located between the first unit andthe second unit) processes information received from the first unit andcommunicates the processed information to the second unit. In somenon-limiting embodiments or aspects, a message may refer to a networkpacket (e.g., a data packet and/or the like) that includes data. It willbe appreciated that numerous other arrangements are possible.

As used herein, the term “identifier” refers to a unique identifierassociated with an individual that may be validated to confirm theindividual when checking an identity.

As used herein, the term “transaction” refers to an interaction betweena user and a relying party, wherein the interaction pertains to making apayment, providing access to a restricted event or area, generating alegally binding contract or agreement, or establishing any other type ofarrangement wherein the party wants to understand the risk associatedwith entering into a transaction requiring a trust relationship with theuser.

As used herein, the term “one-time transaction identifier” refers to anidentifier that may be valid for a pre-determined period of time, or anidentifier that may only be used one time, or to an identifier that isissued one time, may be unchanging, and used always.

As used herein the term “assertion” refers to a factual true/false oryes/no statement about a user, or a combination thereof. For example, anassertion may indicate that a user is above a certain age, is a mortgageholder, and/or has held a bank account for a pre-defined period of time.In each case the assertion indicator may be “true” or “yes” or “false”or “no” or words to such effect which, when there is more than oneassertion, may be taken in aggregate, or may comprise an assertionprofile of a user requesting or entering into a transaction, or anycombination thereof.

As used herein, the term “assertion profile” refers to digitalrepresentation or profile of a user that is formed by information aboutthe user and the user's activities without exposing information thatenables the specific user to be uniquely identified.

As used herein the term “user” may refer to a person, a public orprivate company, or government agency. Collectively they may be referredto as “their” in the disclosure and claims that follow.

As used herein the term “party or relying party” refers to a person,private or public company or entity (e.g., an issuer, processor, ormerchant), or government agency that uses a risk-adjusted transactionidentifier to decide whether to enter a transaction with a user. In somecircumstances, the party is considered to be a “relying party,” e.g.,one who relies on a risk-adjusted identifier to decide if the user isone with whom it may want to transact.

As used herein, the term “processor” refers to an entity capable ofissuing a one-time risk adjusted identifier. Examples may comprise atleast one of the following: an issuer, a smart contract processor, apayment processor, an acquiring processor, or a government processor.The processor may be the same party as the one whom the transaction isbeing conducted or it may be an independent party not associated withthe specific transaction being conducted including, but not limited to,a third-party processor or a party whose business or service includesthe creation of one-time verification risk-adjusted identifiers. Thelatter may include but not be limited to a government agency, or aprivate or public profit or non-profit corporation.

As used herein, the term “identity service” refers to an entity capableof verifying or providing identity information for an individual orobject. Examples may include, but are not limited to, a bank, anemployer, a government agency or department (which may include, but notbe limited to, a motor vehicle department, a revenue service, orregistration service), or insurance provider.

As used herein, the terms “matching” and “partially matching” refer tosoftware or algorithms which may compare two acoustic, optical, and/oralphanumeric patterns to determine if the two patterns comprise the samepattern in accordance with a predetermined threshold. If the resultequals or exceeds the threshold, the patterns are determined to “match”or “partially match.” The matching or partially matching software mayinclude, but not be limited to, voice recognition, optical charactermatching, alphanumeric pattern matching programs, or any combinationthereof.

As used herein, the term “proof-of-identity” may include, but not belimited to, at least one device identifier (for example, a devicefingerprint or phone number), location identifier (for example, a homeor business, or other mailing address), an assertion profile (comprisingwhat assertions are known or not known about the user), governmentidentifier (for example, a social security number or a driver'slicense), an authorized photo (for example, from a passport, a driver'slicense, or a government furnished identity card or tag), or anycombination thereof.

As used herein, the term “relying party risk-adjusted indicator” refersto at least one indicator of the risk a user may pose to a relying partywith respect to the account being requested or the transaction beingentered into. The indicator may be generated using a one-timetransaction identifier and a risk signifier that itself may be generatedbased on risk data available to an identity service.

According to some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects,FIG. 1 depicts at least one processor's system 100 for generating andconveying at least one one-time transaction identifier associated with auser to the user. The example components system 100 may be implementedat least partially by hardware at one or more computing devices, whichmay include, but not be limited to, one or more hardware computingdevices executing software instructions stored in one or more storagedevices for performing the functions that are described herein. Or, oneor more virtual machine instances in a shared computing facility may beused, for example, but not limited to a cloud computing center. System100 illustrates only one of many possible arrangements of componentsconfigured to execute the programming described herein. Otherarrangements may include fewer or different components, and the divisionof work between the components may vary depending on the arrangement.

Software instructions, when stored in a storage device accessible to acomputer device, render the computing device into a special-purposecomputing device that is customized to perform the operations specifiedin the software instructions. The terms “software,” “softwareinstructions,” “computer program,” “computer-executable instructions,”and “computing device-executable instructions” are to be broadlyconstrued to cover any machine-readable information, whether or nothuman-readable, for instructing a computing device to perform specificoperations, and including, but not limited to, application software,desktop applications, scripts, binaries, operating systems, devicedrivers, boot loaders, shells, utilities, system software, JAVASCRIPT,web pages, web applications, plugins, embedded software, microcode,compilers, debuggers, interpreters, virtual machines, linkers, and texteditors.

While functions and operations of the example embodiment(s) may beimplemented entirely with software instructions, hard-wired orprogrammable circuitry of a computing device (e.g., an ASIC, an FPGA, orthe like) may be used in some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, oraspects in place of or in combination with software instructions toperform the functions, according to the requirements of the particularimplementation at hand.

The user may use at least one user device 110 to request an account orenter into at least one transaction with at least one party, initiate atleast one transaction with at least one relying party, enroll their atleast one identity information, or any combination thereof, with atleast one system 100 using strong authentication that is used by the atleast one party to enter into, initiate, accept, conduct, or anycombination thereof the at least one transaction.

User device 110 may include, but not be limited to, a mobile phone,tablet, laptop computer, desk computer, wearable device, or any otherdevice owned by the user capable of communicating with system 100. Theuser may enroll his or her identity information using an input device orinterface associated with user device 110. The input device or interfacemay include, but not be limited to, a physical or digital keyboard, atouch panel, a voice input or recognition system, a cursor controldevice that may include, but not be limited to, a trackball, mouse, ortouchpad, or functionally equivalent input device or interface. Thestrong authentication may include, but not be limited to, a one-timepassword, certificate-based authentication, context-basedauthentication, multi-factor authentication, two-factor authentication,challenge-response authentication, cryptographic processes, or anycombination thereof.

System 100 may comprise one or more computing devices, one or morestorage devices, and one or more means to communicate among and betweenthe devices. A computing device may be a general purpose microprocessor,a system on a chip, a mainframe computer, a cloud-based server, or anyhardware capable of performing the programs required by system 100. Acomputing device may also communicate with another computing device orat least one storage device using a coupled wired or optical bus, awireless channel capability to communicate with at least one computer orstorage device, or any combination thereof. Wireless channels mayinclude, but not be limited to, wireless data networks and protocols(e.g., third-generation (3G), fourth-generation (4G), fifth-generation,(5G), Long-term Evolution (LTE), and other predecessor, futuregeneration or similar networks), Local Area Net (LAN) networks based onthe IEEE 802.11x standard (Wi-Fi®), Bluetooth® Based on Bluetooth®Special Interest (SIT) Standards, Wide Area Net (WAN) networks based onthe IEEE 802.16 set of standards (Wi-Max), Broadband B-ISDN, TCP/IP(which as a minimum may include, but not be limited to, the InternetProtocol (IP), Address Resolution Protocol (ARP), Internet ControlMessage Protocol (ICMP), Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), UserDatagram Protocol (UDP), Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP),Neighbor Discovery Protocol (NDP), ICMPv6, and IGMPv6 and an integratedIPSec security layer), Simple Message Transfer Protocol (SMTP),FileTransfer Protocol (FTP), Code-Division Multiple Access (CDMA)protocol, Global System for Mobile (GSM) protocol, or any such precedingor future networks that may provide access to a network, which mayinclude, but not be limited to the Internet, a private network, oranother device.

A storage device may be a random access memory (RAM) or other dynamicstorage device for storing information and software instructions to beexecuted by a computing device, read-only memory (ROM), or other staticstorage device for storing static information and software instructionsfor computing devices, or a mass storage device for storing informationand software instructions on fixed or movable media, which may include,but not be limited to, magnetic, optical, solid-state, magnetic-optical,flash memory, or any other available mass storage technology.

A storage device may use any one or more storage media, including butnot limited to, any non-transitory media that store data, softwareinstructions, or both and that cause a computing device to operate in aspecific fashion. Such storage media may comprise non-volatile media,volatile media, or both. Non-volatile media may include, but not belimited to, non-volatile random access memory (NVRAM), flash memory,optical disks, magnetic disks, or solid-state drives. Volatile media mayinclude, but not be limited to, dynamic memory that serves as mainmemory. Common forms of storage media include, for example, a floppydisk, a flexible disk, hard disk, solid-state drive, magnetic tape, orany other magnetic data storage medium, a CD-ROM, any other optical datastorage medium, any physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, aPROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, NVRAM, flash memory, and/or any othermemory chip or cartridge.

The above-described computer hardware and software is presented for thepurpose of illustrating the underlying computer components that may beemployed for implementing the example embodiment(s). The exampleembodiment(s), however, are not necessarily limited to any particularcomputing environment or computing device configuration. Instead, theexample embodiment(s) may be implemented in any type of systemarchitecture or processing environment that one skilled in the art, inlight of this disclosure, would understand as capable of supporting thefeatures and functions of the example embodiment(s) presented herein.

Representative proofs-of-identity may include, but not be limited to, aphoto of the user, an image of, or information taken from, governmentprovided proof-of-identity credential or document (including, but notlimited to, a social security number, driver license, passport, or taxidentification number), a biometric, a secret code known only betweenthe user and the party (including, but not limited to, a password, PIN,or passcode), at least one assertion which may comprise an assertionprofile, one or more know-your-customer datum that a user authorizes beused for identification or assertion purposes, or any combinationthereof.

System 100 may comprise at least one transaction computing device 120,at least one risk engine computing device 140, at least one identitycomputing device 150, at least one user proof-of-identity storage device130, at least one user transaction storage device 135, and at least oneidentifier storage device 160. It is recognized that depending on thedesign of system 100, the computing devices may be one or more differentdevices or the same device and that the storage devices may be one ormore different devices or the same device.

The proof-of-identity provided by the user may be received bytransaction computing device 120, in response to which it may be sent toidentity computing device 150 to at least partially match at least onepreviously stored proof-of-identity for the user that it may access fromuser proof-of-identity storage device 130. The at least partial matchresults may then be sent to a risk engine computing device 140 where theat least partial match results may be evaluated in conjunction withother risk related information related to the user that it may requestand receive from a transaction storage device 135.

Transaction storage device 135 stores the user's transaction history.The user's transaction history may comprise a series of at least onehistorical transaction, at least one possible index associated with theuser's history comprising numbers, user device information, event logs,measures of the user's acceptances and declines, at least one risk scoreassociated with the least one previous transaction or index, or anycombination thereof. The at least one risk score may be an output of atleast one fraud model that measures or predicts the likelihood that oneor more past transactions were considered fraudulent. Associated withthe at least one risk score may be at least one risk condition code thatmay provide information on the nature and magnitude of risk associatedwith the transaction, a compromise event reference ID that may identifya specific compromise event related to the transaction, or both.

The risk score may be an indication of the degree of risk that a userposes to the party for the requested account or for the transaction theuser wants to enter into and/or conduct with the party. It may berepresented by a least one risk model's result. The results may comefrom at least one risk model associated with a user's payments,agreements previously entered into, assertions that are valid orinvalid, or any combination thereof. The risk models used may include,but not be limited to, those that may be based on Bayesian statistics orstatistical regression, decision trees, random forests, regularizedlogistic regression, machine-learning based artificial intelligencemodels, or any combination thereof that may be used to determine fraud,credit card, or other financial, transactional, or contractual risks.Additional risk related information that may be used separately orincorporated into an appropriate model may include, but not be limitedto, at least one compromise event reference identifier, specificcompromise event, or datum from some other risk source including, butnot limited to, a credit bureau, a government agency, financialinstitution, or any combination thereof to which the party may haveaccess.

Risk engine computing device 140 may use the user's transaction historyand the at least one risk score, or risk condition code, or compromiseevent reference ID or device information or any combination thereof thatmay be associated with it, at least one decision rule used inconjunction with such data, or any combination thereof, to determine andoutput a degree of risk that the user may pose for the party should theparty accept the user's transaction request. The degree of risk may besignified by a risk signifier, which may comprise as a number (forexample, from 1 to 100), a score expressed as a percentage, a qualifier(for example, high, medium, low), a symbol (for example, a plus sign foracceptable risk, a minus sign for unacceptable risk, or an equal signfor indeterminate or neutral risk), and any possible combinationthereof.

The risk signifier output by risk engine computing device 140 may besent to a one-time transaction identifier computing device 150 to createa one-time transaction identifier for the user to use with the at leastthe one transaction. The one-time transaction identifier may be aone-time alphanumeric identifier that may be sent to the user's device110 and simultaneously sent to and stored in identifier storage device160.

The at least one one-time transaction identifier may be combined withthe risk signifier generated by risk engine computing device 140 that isrelated to the user for the at least one requested transaction togenerate at least one relying party risk-adjusted indicator, which goingforward will simply be referred to as a relying party risk-adjustedindicator. It too may have a one-time use for the specific transactionfor which it may be generated; it may also be saved and reused. The useor reuse of the indicator may depend on the use criteria or decisionlogic used by the relying party.

The at least one one-time risk-adjusted indicator may be stored in anidentifier storage device 160 in any number of ways that may bespecified for the storage device in accordance with the data structureof the storage device. Storage device databases may include, but not belimited to, a relational, block chain, or distributed ledger,object-oriented, hierarchical, or graphical database, or any combinationthereof. Consider the following illustrative non-limiting exampleswherein the relying party risk-adjusted indicator may be represented asa relational element in a relational database with pointers associatedwith the user, as a block on a block chain, or in a table structurewherein the one-time transaction identifier and risk signifier may beappended or concatenated data elements, or both, that may comprise atleast one new data element which, then, may also be hashed or otherwiseencrypted. Non-limiting illustrative expressions, embodiments, oraspects of these types of database structures are further describedbelow in the discussion of FIGS. 5A-5E.

If both a one-time transaction identifier and a degree-of-risk signifierare both numerical, then their combination may also be expressed as theresult of at least one mathematical equation, comprising at least one ofthe following: a multiplication, division, addition, or non-linearexpression of the two numbers which may or may not then be normalized inrelation to some predefined scale, which may then also be hashed orotherwise encrypted, or any combination thereof.

Note, however, that the relying party risk-adjusted indicator may bestored in identifier storage device 160, and the user may only receivethe one-time transaction identifier without any indication of the riskassociated with it. That is, the risk adjustment associated with theone-time transaction identifier that in combination with the at leastone associated risk signifier may generate a relying party risk-adjustedindicator may only be communicated to and known by the relying partyfrom whom the user requested an account or with whom the transaction maybe conducted. The user may not receive or be notified of adegree-of-risk determination or how it is being signified for or to therelying party.

The computing and storage devices described heretofore may be a party'sor owned, managed, and maintained by an independent service provider tothe party, or represent some combination of thereof. If a serviceprovider is involved, then it may convey one or more results of itsprocessing to the relying party The party may use the signifieddegree-of-risk to proceed with the account or transaction by requiringthe user to respond to and correctly answer a challenge question usinguser device 110 before agreeing to proceed with the account or thetransaction, or by declining issuing the account or entering into thetransaction. The challenge question may include, but not be limited to,asking for a password or an answer to a personal question or anycombination thereof, wherein the password, answer, or any combinationthereof may have been submitted by the user and stored in at least oneof system 100 storage device represented in FIG. 1 .

According to some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects,FIG. 2 illustrates processes that may be required to create a relyingparty risk-adjusted indicator. A user 210 may provide at least oneproof-of-identity 220 to request an account or initiate transactionprocessing using a user device 110 represented in FIG. 1 .

The proof-of-identity 220 may be an input for at least one riskassessment process 230. The risk assessment process may be hosted by atleast one computing device represented in FIG. 1 that may be programedor configured by software and algorithms to request and receive a userstored proof-of-identity 280 and user transaction and device historyinformation 285 (collectively referred hereafter to as transactionhistory 285). The stored proof-of-identity 280 and transaction history285 may be stored in at least one storage device represented in FIG. 1 .

Based on the received proof-of-identity 220, the risk assessment process230 may determine whether user provided proof-of-identity 220 at leastpartially matches at least one stored proof-of-identity 280. If theproof-of-identity 220 is not at least partially matched, then the riskassessment process 230 may be programmed or configured to decline user'srequest for an account or to initiate a transaction. However, if basedon at a least partial match of proof-of-identity 220 with at least oneproof-of-identity 280, then the risk assessment process 230 may befurther programmed or configured to require that a challenge decision235 be made as to whether or not user 210 needs to respond to achallenge request. If the challenge decision 235 made is to not requesta challenge response, then risk assessment process 230 may comprisesoftware or algorithms programmed or configured to instruct at least oneone-time transaction identifier generation process 270 to generate atleast one one-time transaction identifier. One-time transactionidentifier generation process 270 may be hosted on at least onecomputing device represented in FIG. 1 and comprise software andalgorithms to generate the one one-time transaction identifier, inresponse to which it is communicated to user 210.

The result of the challenge decision 235 may be that a challenge requestis to be made, in response to which risk assessment process 230 may beprogrammed or configured to generate and communicate at least onechallenge question 237 to user device 110 to which user 210 mustrespond. User 210 may submit a challenge response 240 using user device110, which may be communicated to challenge response processing 250.Challenge response processing 250 may comprise software and algorithmshosted on at least one system 100 computing device. Challenge responseprocessing may involve accessing at least one storage device of system100, searching for at least one user stored challenge response and, inresponse to finding at least one user stored challenge response,attempting to at least partially match the at least one stored challengeresponse with the at least one response 240 provided by user 210 inresponse to receiving the at least one challenge question 237. Theresult of challenge response processing 250 may be used as a basis of atleast one acceptance decision 260. In response to the challenge responseprocessing 250 resulting in at least a partial match, acceptancedecision 260 may instruct one-time transaction identifier generationprocess 270 to generate at least one a one-time transaction identifierin response to which the at least one one-time transaction identifiermay be generated and communicated to user device 110. If challengeresponse 240 does not result in at least a partial match, thenacceptance decision 260 may result in an instruction to risk assessmentprocess 230 to decline the account request or the transaction, inresponse to which a decline response may be communicated to user device110.

In addition to determining whether user 210 is at least partiallymatched and providing its output to challenge decision risk decision235, risk assessment process 230 may output at least one risk signifierof the degree of risk user 210 represents to the at least one partyshould the party issue the account or enter into the transaction withuser 210. The risk signifier may be based on the user transactionhistory 285 that may be stored in at least one storage device of system100.

Risk assessment process 230 may perform instructions to search the atleast one system 100 storage device for the user transaction historyinformation 285. If found, transaction history information 285 may becommunicated to risk assessment process 230, in response to which it maybe used to generate the at least one risk signifier. As described above,the risk signifier may be a score (for example, from 1 to 100), a scoreexpressed as a percentage, a qualifier (for example, high, medium, low),a symbol (for example, a plus sign for acceptable risk, a minus sign forunacceptable risk, or an equal sign for indeterminate or neutral risk),and possible combinations thereof.

One-time transaction identifier generation process 270 may, in additionto sending a one-time transaction identifier to user 210, combine thegenerated risk signifier with the generated one-time transactionidentifier, thereby generating a relying party risk-adjusted indicator.The combination may comprise appending or concatenating, or anycombination thereof, the risk signifier to or with the one-timetransaction identifier if the risk signifier comprises a symbol orqualifier or mathematically determined score. If the one-timetransaction identifier and risk signifier are both numerical, then thecombination may comprise performing a mathematical operation that useseach. Examples may include, but not be limited to, raising one to thepower of the other, using one as a numerator and the other as adenominator, using one as a multiplicand and the other as a multiplier,combining them in a defined non-linear equation, or any combinationthereof. Once determined, a resulting relying party risk-adjustedindicator may be compared to a normalized score (if numerical),interpreted according decision logic in the software and algorithms thatmay be used by processors evaluating or authorizing a transaction, orany combination thereof.

Once determined, the relying party risk-adjusted indicator may be hashedor otherwise encrypted and communicated to the relying party to thetransaction, in response to which the party may use it to eitherauthorize or reject the account or the transaction request dependingupon the decision logic, criteria, or any combination thereof that theparty-to-the-transaction's at least one computer device's programming orconfiguration may use.

The hashed or otherwise encrypted risk-adjusted indicator may also becommunicated to and stored in a storage device of system 100. Asdescribed above, storage of the relying party risk-adjusted indicatormay be in accordance with the data structure of the storage device.Storage device databases may include, but not be limited to, arelational, block chain, or distributed ledger, object-oriented,hierarchical, or graphical database, or any combination thereof. Asmentioned above, non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects ofthese types of database structures follow are further described below inthe discussion of FIGS. 5A-5E.

As noted above, the user may only receive the one-time transactionidentifier without any indication of the risk associated with it. Thatis, the risk adjustment associated with the one-time transactionidentifier that combined comprise the relying party risk-adjustedindicator may only be communicated to and known by the relying partywith whom the user's requested transaction may be conducted. The usermay not receive or be notified of a degree-of-risk determination or howit is being signified for and/or to the relying party.

According to some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects,FIG. 3 represents steps at least one user may take to request an accountor a transaction using at least one device 110 programmed or configuredto generate and communicate the request to at least one processor system100. In step 310, the at least one user may request that an account becreated as one, but not the only, example. In response to the request,the at least one relying party with whom the transaction may occur maygenerate and communicate a request from transaction processor 120 for atleast one user's proof-of-identity from the user. The request may bereceived by the at least one user through the at least one user's device110. The at least one user may communicate at least one proof-ofidentity in step 320, if they have at least one, or by communicatingwith at least one identity provider, in response to which identity theprovider may communicate it to processor system 100, to the at least oneuser device 110, in response to which the at least one user maycommunicate it to processor system 100, or any combination thereof. Ifthe communicated at least one proof-of-identity is at least partiallymatched by processor system 100, then using user device 110, the atleast one user may generate and communicate with processor system 100 arequest that it generate at least one one-time transaction identifier instep 350. Processor system 100 may be programmed or configured toreceive the request, in response to which it may determine andcommunicate at least one one-time transaction identifier to the at leastone user's device 110 which may be programmed or configured to receiveit in step 360. If the relying party does not at least partially matchthe user's-proof-of-identity, then processor system 100 may beprogrammed or configured to communicate this to the at least one party,who in response may, at its option, communicate with the processorsystem 100 and request that it generate and communicate at least onechallenge question to the at least one user, in response to which it maybe programmed and configured to generate and communicate the at leastone challenge question to the at least one user whose at least one userdevice 110 may be programmed or configured to receive the at least onechallenge question in step 330. If received, the at least one user mayuse the at least one user device 110 to input at least one challengeresponse and communicate it to processor system 100 in step 340, inresponse to which processor system 100 may be programmed or configuredto communicate the at least one challenge response 340 to the at leastone party. If the at least one party approves the at least one challengeresponse 340 and communicates this to processor system 100, processorsystem 100 may be programmed or configured to communicate the at leastone party's approval to the at least one user's at least one user device110. In response to receiving the at least one party's approval, the atleast one user may request at least one one-time-identifier in step 350using at least one user device 110 programmed or configured to generateand communicate this request to processor system 100. In response toreceiving at least one request of at least one one-time transactionidentifier, processor system 100's programming or configuration maygenerate at least one one-time transaction identifier and communicate itto the at least one user. The user may receive the one-time transactionidentifier in step 360 on the at least one user device 110. Once theuser receives the one-time transaction identifier in step 360, the usermay in step 370 input the at least one one-time transaction identifierinto the at least one user device 110 and use its programming andconfiguration to communicate it to processor system 100, in response towhich processor system 100 may be programmed or configured to provide itto the at least one party in order to proceed with any further stepsneeded to conduct the transaction.

According to some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects,FIG. 4 represents the steps at least one processor system 100 may takewhen it receives a transaction request from at least one user. In step410 the at least one processor system may be programmed or configured toreceive at least one transaction request from at least one user. Inresponse to receiving the at least one request, processor system 100 mayin step 420 be programmed or configured to generate and communicate arequest for at least one proof-of-identity from the at least one user onat least one user device 110. If the processor system 100 is not atleast one relying party's, but rather operates on behalf of the at leastone relying party, then the at least one processor system 100 also maybe programmed or configured to communicate the request to the at leastone relying party to the transaction who may, in response to receivingthe request, communicate back to the at least one processor 100 that itrequest at least one proof-of-identity of the at least one user, inresponse to which it may generate and communicate the at least onerequest to the user on at least one user device 110.

If the at least one processing system 100 is programmed or configured toreceive and does receive at least one of the user's at least oneproof-of-identity, then in step 425 the processor system 100 may beprogrammed or configured to process the received at least oneproof-of-identity and determine if it at least partially matches the atleast one of the user's proof-of-identity that may be stored inprocessor system 100. If the at least one processor system 100determines that there is at least a partial match, it may be programmedor configured to accept the proof-of-identity, in response to which maybe programmed or configured to generate at least one one-timetransaction identifier in step 450 and then to communicate the at leastone one-time transaction identifier to the user in step 460, who mayreceive it on at least one user device 110.

If the at least one processor system 100 does not at least partiallymatch the at least one user's proof-of-identity with one stored inprocessor system 100, then the at least one processor system 100 may beprogrammed or configured to optionally generate and communicate at leastone challenge to the user in step 430. The at least one processor system100 also may be programmed or configured in step 430 to send itsdetermination that the received at least one proof-of-identity did notat least partially match at least one user's stored proof-of-identity tothe relying party, in response to which, at its discretion, the at leastone party may communicate with the at least one processor system 100 andinstruct that it generate and communicate at least one challenge requestto the at least one user on the at least one user device 110.

Upon receiving the at least one challenge, the at least one user mayinput at least one challenge response into at least one user device 110which may be programmed or configured to communicate it to the at leastone processor system 100.

The at least one processor system 100 may be programmed or configured toreceive the at least one challenge response in step 440 to determine ifit at least partially matches the at least one challenge response storedin at least one of its storage devices. If it determines that there isat least one partial match, then in step 440 the at least one processorsystem 100 may be programmed or configured to generate and communicateat least one one-time transaction identifier to the at least one user onat least one user device 110 in steps 450 and 460, respectively.

Whenever the at least one user receives at least one one-timetransaction identifier, the user may input it into the at least one userdevice 110, wherein the at least one user device 110 may be programmedto communicate it to the at least one processor system 100. Processorsystem 100 may be programmed or configured to receive the at least oneone-time transaction identifier in step 470, wherein it may be used todetermine if the at least one user's transaction request may be approvedor denied. This determination may be made using the output of steps 480and 490.

In steps 480 and 490, processor system 100 may be programmed orconfigured to determine and communicate, respectively, at least onerelying party risk-adjusted indicator to the at least one relying partyto the transaction further in response to which the at least one relyingparty to the transaction may determine to proceed to conduct the atleast one transaction or to decline the at least one transaction.

Note that unless otherwise noted, the at least one processor system 100may be that of the relying party to the transaction or at least oneother relying party's system that is accessed by and in communicationwith the at least one party to the transaction.

According to some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects,FIGS. 5A-5E depict data structures that may be used by a relying partyto store a user's at least one relying party risk-adjusted indicator andassociated information. The records depicted in FIGS. 5A-5E may storethe user's information from the at least one proof-of-identity the user210 provides to the party and the transaction history underlying therisk adjustment made for the at least one relying party risk-adjustedindicator for a transaction that the relying party may accept, deny,initiate, enter into with user 210, or any combination thereof. Forexample, if a block chain structure like the one illustrated in FIG. 5Amay be used, then the at least one relying party risk-adjusted indicatormay be stored as at least one block of a block chain, wherein the user'sproof-of-identity, transaction history, transaction information (whichmay include, but not be limited to, the transaction type, amount, time,and location), and the party to the transaction are also represented inthe block of the block chain. As relational elements in a relationaldatabase, like the one represented in FIG. 5B, the at least one relyingparty risk-adjusted indicator may be stored with pointers to the user,the user's at least one proof-of-identity, transaction history, and theparty to the transaction, each of which may be separately stored in thesame or different system 100 storage device(s). If stored inhierarchical, object, or graphical databases, then the transaction maycomprise a data item to which the user's at least one relying partyrisk-adjusted indicator, proof-of-identity, transaction history, andparty to the transaction may roll up to or be linked, as depicted inFIGS. 5C, 5D, and 5E, respectively. Note that the illustrative databasesshown in FIGS. 5A-5E may be used in various combinations and ascentralized or distributed database structures within one or more systemstorage devices and that they are not meant to exclude the use of otherstructures that may be available, become available, be developed orenhanced in the future, or any combination thereof.

According to some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects,FIG. 6 illustrates certain interactions that at least one user may havewith at least one processor or at least one relying party incommunication with the at least one processor, or any combination ofthereof using at least one user device, in this case a mobile phone. Onat least one screen 610 of the at least one user device, a user mayinput at least one request to enter into or conduct a transaction andrequest an at least one one-time transaction identifier. The at leastone processor or party then may send a message that may be displayed onat least one screen 620 to the at least one user asking for at least oneproof-of-identity. If at least one proof-of-identity is available on theat least one user's mobile device, the at least one user may send amessage authorizing which specific at least one proof-of-identity may besent by making inputs on at least one screen 630, for example, by makingcheck-marks in check-boxes on screen 630 to specify the at least oneproof-of-identity or assertion based proofs-of-identity that the atleast one user approves to be sent to the at least one processor orparty as an assertion profile and by leaving unchecked check-boxes onscreen 630 for the at least one proof-of-identity that may not beauthorized to be sent to the at least one processor or party. If the atleast one proof-of-identity is not stored on the at least one user'sphone, but is stored with the processor or the relying party, the atleast one user may use at least one screen 630 to authorize whatinformation may be authorized by the party or communicated to the partyby the processor, or any combination thereof.

If the at least one processor or party may at least partially match theuser on the basis of the at least one authorized proof-of-identity theuser sends, or has sent, with at least one proof-of-identity theprocessor or party stores in at least one of their storage devices, forexample, a processor's processor system storage devices 130 or 160 shownin FIG. 1 , the at least one processor or party may send the user aone-time transaction identifier, in this case a code in message sent toand displayed on at least one screen 640, in response to which the atleast one user may enter this code into a text field on at least onescreen 650 and communicate it back to the processor or to the party toconfirm their identity. Upon receiving the at least one one-timetransaction identifier from the at least one user, the processor orparty may approve or reject proceeding with the at least one transactionon the basis of at least one relying party risk-adjusted indicator thatmay be generated for, communicated to, and used by the relying party(not shown), but which is not sent to the at least one user.

FIG. 7 is a non-limiting illustration showing that the at least one usermay receive on least one user device screen 710 a request from at leastone identity service, in this case a bank, to approve it communicatingat least one proof-of-identity to at least one relying party, in thiscase a hospital. The at least one identity service may then send atleast one instruction presented on at least one user device screen 715,wherein the instruction is for the user to request at least one one-timetransaction identifier. In response to the at least one user followingthe instruction presented on screen 715, the identity server maycommunicate at least one one-time transaction identifier as a code tothe user device which it displays on at least one screen 720. If the atleast one user inputs the at least one-time transaction identifier on atleast one screen 730, the user's device may communicate it to the atleast one identity service, which may result in a display on at leastone user device screen 740 that may indicate that the service isobtaining information that may need to be authorized and communicated tothe at least one relying party.

If the required risk information may be available, the at least oneidentity service may communicate specific proof-of-identify informationthat may be authorized and communicated to the at least one relayingparty. The available information may be presented on the at least oneuser's device as at least one screen 750. The at least one communicationof available proof-of concept information may be communicated to the atleast one user's device in a variety of ways including, but not limitedto, a push notification to the user's mobile application.

As an example, the at least one user device screen 750 may show the atleast one user proof-of-identity information that may be available tocommunicate to the at least one requesting relying party and for whichthe at least one user may or may not confirm his or her permission tocommunicate to the relying party. An option may allow the user to selectwhich information may be shared with the at least one relying party,like an address, bank number, or assertions related to such information,or any combination thereof. For example, screen 750 exemplifiesinformation that the user may authorize to communicate to the relyingparty or may be used as the basis of an assertion profile to becommunicated to the at least one relying party.

As shown on the at least one screen 750, the user may put check-marks incheck-boxes to indicate the information that he or she authorizes the atleast one identity service to communicate to the at least one relyingparty and may leave unchecked the check-boxes for the information thatthe user does not authorize be sent to the relying party.

In some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects, the userupdates old information within the application before a response may becommunicated to a relying party. In some non-limiting expressions,embodiments, or aspects, the data required may be specific to the typeof account being requested or to the transaction to be entered into. Inthis sense, the required information may be considered dynamic.

In some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects, the at leastone identity service may communicate to the at least one user the nameof at least one relying party along with the at least oneproof-of-identity required to enter into or conduct a transaction, inresponse to which the user may authorize what at least oneproof-of-identity may and may not be provided to the at least onerequesting party (not shown).

In some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects, the at leastone user's at least one proof-of-identity information that may be usedas an aspect of a user's identity or may be used to enable an identityservice or relying party to use the user's proof-of-identity informationmay include a user's biometric (which may include, but not be limitedto, a fingerprint, voice recognition, face recognition, irisrecognition, and/or the like), a PIN, a password, or any combinationthereof.

In some non-limiting expressions, embodiments, or aspects, the at leastone user making at least one proof-of-identity request of the at leastone identity service may have been vetted previously by the at least oneidentity service, in response to which it may have provided at least oneencrypted token to the at least one user to validate himself or herselfwhen making at least one proof-of-identity request. They may use suchtokens to thwart attempts by a fraudster to spoof a relying partyinsofar as the fraudster may not have access to a token and may not begranted a one-time code to the identity service without using at leastone valid token.

As it may pertain to FIG. 6 and FIG. 7 , it is worth noting that thesteps depicted in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 remain relevant, if some of thesteps may be reordered. For example, steps 320 and 350 in FIG. 3 may betransposed to reflect that a user may request a one-time transactionidentifier before a proof-of-identity may be provided to or accessed byat least one processor system 100 or party, or any combination thereof.Similarly, steps 450, 460, and 470 in FIG. 4 may occur after step 410 ifa code may be provided to at least one user in advance of its receivingor accessing at least one user's proof-of-identity.

Although the disclosed subject matter has been described in detail forthe purpose of illustration based on what is currently considered to bethe most practical and preferred embodiments or aspects, it is to beunderstood that such detail is solely for that purpose and that thedisclosed subject matter is not limited to the disclosed embodiments oraspects, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover modifications andequivalent arrangements that are within the spirit and scope of theappended claims. For example, it is to be understood that the presentlydisclosed subject matter contemplates that, to the extent possible, oneor more features of any embodiment can be combined with one or morefeatures of any other embodiment.

What is claimed is:
 1. A relying party risk-adjusted indicatorgeneration system, comprising: at least one computing device programmedor configured to: receive at least one account or transaction requestfrom at least one user to enter into a transaction with at least onerelying party; receive at least one proof-of-identity from the at leastone user; generate at least one one-time transaction identifier; accessdata associated with the at least one user; generate at least one risksignifier associated with the at least one user based on the accesseddata; generate at least one relying party risk-adjusted indicatorcomprising the at least one risk signifier and the at least one one-timetransaction identifier; communicate the at least one one-timetransaction identifier to the at least one user; and communicate the atleast one relying party risk-adjusted indicator to the at least onerelying party to the transaction.
 2. The relying party risk-adjustedindicator generation system of claim 1, wherein the at least onecomputing device of the relying party risk-adjusted indicator generationsystem is programmed or configured to: receive the at least one one-timetransaction identifier from the at least one user; and authenticate theat least one user and proceed with the at least one transaction.
 3. Therelying party risk-adjusted indicator generation system of claim 1,wherein the at least one transaction comprises at least one of thefollowing: requesting an account, conducting a transaction, or anycombination thereof.
 4. The relying party risk-adjusted indicatorgeneration system of claim 1, wherein the at least one risk signifier isbased on at least one of the following: at least one device fingerprint,at least one location, at least one transaction history, at least onerisk score from at least one risk model, at least one assertion profileassociated with the at least one user, at least a partial match of theat least one proof-of-identity provided by the at least one user with atleast one stored proof-of-identity previously received from the at leastone user, or any combination thereof.
 5. The relying party risk-adjustedindicator generation system of claim 1, wherein the at least one risksignifier is communicated as at least one of the following appended toor concatenated with a one-time transaction identifier: a number, analphanumeric, a symbol, a minus sign, a plus sign, an equal sign, or anycombination thereof.
 6. The relying party risk-adjusted indicatorgeneration system of claim 1, wherein the at least one one-timetransaction identifier and the at least one risk signifier are bothnumbers, which are combined to determine or generate the relying partyrisk-adjusted indicator using at least one of the following:multiplication, division, addition, a non-linear expression, a resultnormalized in relation to a predefined scale, a hashed number, anencrypted number, or any combination thereof.
 7. The relying partyrisk-adjusted indicator generation system of claim 1, wherein the dataassociated with the at least one relying party risk-adjusted indicatoris stored in at least one of the at least one computing device's storagedevices in at least one of the following: on a block chain, in arelational database, a hierarchical database, an object-orienteddatabase, a graphical database, or any combination thereof.
 8. Therelying party risk-adjusted indicator generation system of claim 1,wherein the at least one proof-of-identity comprises at least one of thefollowing: at least one device identifier, a device fingerprint, a phonenumber, a location identifier, a home, a business, a mailing address, anassertion profile, at least one assertion known or not known about theuser, a government identifier, a social security number, a driver'slicense, an authorized photo, a passport, a government furnishedidentity card or tag, or any combination thereof.
 9. The relying partyrisk-adjusted indicator generation system of claim 1, wherein the atleast one risk signifier comprises output of at least one risk modelcomputing the risk of the at least one transaction using at least one ofthe following: at least one user's payment, an agreement, an assertion,a compromise-event reference identifier, a compromise event history,data from at least one risk source, a credit bureau, a government agencyor department, or any combination thereof.
 10. The relying partyrisk-adjusted indicator generation system of claim 1, wherein the atleast one computing device of the relying party risk-adjusted indicatorgeneration system is programmed or configured to generate a relyingparty risk-adjusted indicator by combining the at least one one-timetransaction identifier with a risk signifier associated with the riskthe at least one user poses to the at least one relying party for the atleast one transaction to be conducted.
 11. A relying party risk-adjustedindicator generation method, comprising: receiving, with at least onecomputing device, at least one account or transaction request from atleast one user to enter into at least one transaction with at least oneparty; receiving, with at least one computing device, at least oneproof-of-identity from the at least one user; generating, with at leastone computing device, at least one one-time transaction identifier;accessing, with at least one computing device, data associated with theat least one user; generating, with at least one computing device, atleast one risk signifier associated with the data; generating, with atleast one computing device, at least one relying party risk-adjustedidentifier comprising the at least one risk signifier and the at leastone one-time transaction identifier; communicating, with at least onecomputing device, the at least one one-time transaction identifier tothe at least one user; and communicating, with at least one computingdevice, the at least one relying party risk-adjusted indicator to the atleast one relying party to the transaction.
 12. The relying partyrisk-adjusted indicator generation method of claim 11, furthercomprising generating, with at least one computing device, a relyingparty risk-adjusted indicator by combining the at least one one-timetransaction identifier with at least one risk signifier associated withthe risk the at least one user poses to the relying party for the atleast one transaction to be conducted.
 13. The relying partyrisk-adjusted indicator generation method of claim 11, wherein the atleast one risk signifier is based on at least one of the following: atleast one device fingerprint, a location, at least one transactionhistory, at least one risk score from at least one risk model, at leastone assertion profile associated with the at least one user, at least apartial match of the at least one proof-of-identity that the at leastone user provides with at least one stored proof-of-identity previouslyreceived from the at least one user, or any combination thereof.
 14. Therelying party risk-adjusted indicator generation method of claim 11,wherein the at least one risk signifier is communicated as at least oneof the following appended to or concatenated with a one-time transactionidentifier: a number, an alphanumeric, a symbol, a minus sign, a plussign, an equal sign, or any combination thereof.
 15. The relying partyrisk-adjusted indicator generation method of claim 11, wherein the atleast one one-time transaction identifier and the at least one risksignifier are both numbers, which are combined to determine or generateat least one relying party risk-adjusted indicator using at least one ofthe following: multiplication, division, addition, a non-linearexpression, a result normalized in relation to a predefined scale, ahashed number, an encrypted number, or any combination thereof.
 16. Therelying party risk-adjusted indicator generation method of claim 11,wherein the data associated with the at least one relying partyrisk-adjusted indicator is stored in the at least one computing device'sstorage device in at least one of the following: on a block chain, in arelational database, a hierarchical database, an object-orienteddatabase, a graphical database, or any combination thereof.
 17. Therelying party risk-adjusted indicator generation method of claim 11,wherein the at least one proof-of-identity comprises at least one of thefollowing: at least one device identifier, a device fingerprint, a phonenumber, a location identifier, a home, a business, a mailing address, anassertion profile, at least one assertion known or not known about theuser, a government identifier, a social security number, a driver'slicense, an authorized photo, a passport, a government furnishedidentity card or tag, or any combination thereof.
 18. The relying partyrisk-adjusted indicator method of claim 11, wherein the at least onerisk signifier comprises output of at least one risk model computing therisk of the at least one transaction using at least one of thefollowing: at least one user's payment, an agreement, an assertion, acompromise-event reference identifier, a compromise event history, datafrom at least one risk source, a credit bureau, a government agency ordepartment, or any combination thereof.